How To Include Research
Last week, I looked at some strategies for gathering research information for
creative nonfiction. If you’re like me,
you’ll uncover many more facts than you can use.
So how do you weave your research into your nonfiction piece so that it
reads like a story rather than a technical report?
How Much Research?
First
of all, consider how much research information you need to include. This will differ according to the type of
piece you’re writing. If it’s a newspaper
or magazine feature article on a current issue, you would probably use more
research than you would for a memoir.
Even then, it would depend on the type of memoir. If you’re writing about your journey with a
rare illness, you may want to note more research about it.
Balance
Once
you’ve determined how much research you need, try to find a good
balance between the facts and figures and your other story elements. As with fiction, it’s a good idea to unveil a
bit at a time rather than having information dumps. Lee Gutkind and others have recommended using
a highlighter pen to mark up different sections of your story so you can see
how the different components work together.
For example, you could highlight all of the sections in an article that
relate to research facts. Are they
spread throughout the story or do they appear all at once? If you find big chunks of facts, you should
think about breaking them up.
Purpose
Any
research you include should be there to support the story you want to
tell. You shouldn’t add information just
for the sake of it. It might be interesting, but does it tie in with the rest of your story and strengthen
the point you want to make? If not, toss
it out. Your readers will thank you.
An Example
My
husband Tim was born with spastic diplegia, a condition that affects his legs.
He uses a walking stick and can’t move quickly.
Going up and down stairs can be especially difficult as he doesn’t have
a lot of flexibility in his knees and ankles.
This is manageable in Australia, which is relatively disability-aware. However, it was more problematic when we went
on a bus tour of Italy in 2004.
I
wrote a 2700-word travel essay about our time in Italy, that has since been published. In the extract
below, I’ve included some research about disabled access.
Next stop was
St Peter’s Basilica. Half the people on
our tour were Americans of Italian extraction, with accents that wouldn’t have
been out of place in one of the Godfather movies. They were enamoured of the spectacular
interior of St Peter’s. Lots of statues
of saints and past popes, and ornate artistry everywhere including the
incredible dome and altars. However, I …
was drawn instead to the Pietà – the iconic sculpture of Mary cradling the body
of her crucified son.
I wanted to
reach out to the grieving mother, but the statue was above eye level and not
easily accessible. Bulletproof glass,
the legacy of an attack with a geologist’s hammer in the 70s, also kept us at
bay. I wanted to get a better view, but
then I noticed a woman in a wheelchair craning her neck to see above the
crowd. Suddenly it dawned on me. She and the woman at the Sistine Chapel were
the only wheelchair-bound people we’d seen since arriving in Europe sixteen
days before. Where did Europe put its
disabled?
Some months
later, Time magazine ran an article on disabled access in Europe which
confirmed our observations and more.
Although Europe had a disabled population of about fifty million, it
lagged behind most of the Western world in making reasonable provisions for
disabled people. A survey carried out in
Rome in 2004 found that only 20% of buildings had complete disabled
access. By the time you factored in the
scarcity of suitable public transport and the predilection of Europeans for
putting most of their toilets up or down flights of stairs, I was beginning to
understand why we hadn’t seen many disabled people out and about. Australia had ramps, disabled parking spaces
and disabled loos. Italy had
cobblestones, narrow passageways and steps.
Lots of steps.
But there
were lighter moments too.
You’ll
notice that I included a fact about the Pietà ,
namely that it was protected by bulletproof glass because someone had attacked it
with a hammer in the 70s. I could have provided more details, such as the name of the hammer-wielding culprit or the
dimensions of the glass. However, that
wasn’t relevant to my main theme of disabled access. I only needed to show why it was difficult
for the woman in the wheelchair to get close to it.
You’ll
also see that I’ve cited some facts about disabled access from a Time Magazine
article. It may seem like I’ve given a lot of research in that paragraph, but
that’s the most I mention in the whole essay and it’s balanced against other
personal recollections. By citing
actual facts about disabled access in Europe, it puts our own experiences in
context. Right after that
passage, I revert back to personal anecdotes and share a funny
story. Although the essay has a serious message,
there are lots of lighter moments so that the reader hopefully goes away feeling
entertained as well as more aware of the issue.
If you’d like to see more, you can read the whole essay here.
Do
you have some half-written articles or memoir pieces in a drawer
somewhere? Why not take them out and see
if any of them could be enhanced by some well-placed research. You might just strike the universal chord
your readers are looking for.
Sources:
Gutkind, L.
(2012). You can’t make this stuff up: The complete guide to
writing creative nonfiction from memoir to literary journalism and everything
in between. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.
Passmore, N.
L. (2014). Vespas, wheelchairs, and the metamorphosis of
Alberto. In J. Cooper, B. Morton, J. Spencer & C. Tuovinen
(Eds.), Tales from the upper room: Tabor Adelaide anthology 2014 (pp.
12-19). Saint Marys, South Australia: Immortalise.
Nola Passmore is a freelance writer who has had more than 140 short
pieces published, including devotionals, true stories, magazine articles,
academic papers, poetry and short fiction. She loves sharing what
God has done in her life and encouraging others to do the same. She and
her husband Tim have their own freelance writing and editing business called
The Write Flourish. You can find her writing tips blog at their
website: http://www.thewriteflourish.com.au
Great post, Nola! As with everything else, that balance between elements is essential, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteHi Lynne - Yes, it can be a tricky balancing act, especially when you've done tons of research and want to tell everyone all the fascinating things you've learned. Guess it's the same with novels. Sometimes less is more. Thanks for your comment :)
DeleteYes, a great post, Nola - and I enjoyed reading your travel essay :)
ReplyDeleteWow Jenny. Gold star for making your way through that :) Thanks for your comment.
DeleteIt was easy and entertaining to read - with a great message about accessibility and assumptions :)
DeleteNola, excellent post and series! Thanks for sharing your expertise with us. :)
ReplyDeleteIf you'd like to learn more about this topic from Nola, you'll be happy to know that she's presenting a workshop titled "Creative Nonfiction – techniques for adding sparkle to your manuscript" at the Christian Writers Conference in Bacchus Marsh, Victoria, October 23-25, 2015.
More information on the conference can be found at the following link.
http://www.christianwritersconference.org.au/
Thanks for the conference promo Narelle :) Writing blog posts is a great way to prepare for workshops. I've learned a lot preparing the series too.
DeleteAnother great post, Nola. It's such an important balance to add enough research to draw sufficient parallels for credibility, but not overwhelm a reader with mounds of facts. I've seen both extremes, but when the writer gets it right, it adds so much to the reading experience.
ReplyDeleteThanks Adele. Yes getting it right is the tricky part. But when we do strike that balance, hopefully it whets the reader's appetite so that they'll want to look into the issue more. Thanks for taking the time to comment :)
ReplyDelete