“Give me the same thing… only different!”
Blurted
from the lips of a studio executive and committed to paper by Blake Snyder in
his screenwriting text, Save the Cat,
this conundrum has faced artists for millennia. Some brave souls commit themselves to beating
new paths through uncharted forests of creativity, exalting originality and the authenticity of personal expression above other virtues.
Except in rare instances, they also restrict themselves to niche or non-existent markets. Acid jazz,
anyone? While this does not diminish the validity of their art, it can make it difficult to earn a living.
To the
other extreme, we enter the cringe-worthy territory of cliché. These
expressions were original once but were so effective that everyone jumped on
the band wagon (see what I did there?). Some clichés have been around so long
that we've forgotten where they came from. They make little sense to our modern ear and can generate confusion rather than impact. Does anyone really cry over spilt milk? And when has a cat ever
stolen a tongue to keep someone from speaking?
Even more
concerning is the grey area between “inspired by” and plagiarism. Coldplay were
famously sued when their hit, “Viva la Vida”, sounded suspiciously like
Joe Satriani’s “If I Could Fly”. Noel Gallagher from Oasis voiced his ire over
the similarities he
saw between his hit, “Wonderwall”, and Greenday’s “Boulevard of Broken Dreams”.
It may not be possible to patent chord progressions but law suits have been won
over four bars of music (Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree versus Down
Under).
My current
creative dilemma involves choosing a new logo for Omega Writers. We want a logo
that pops its head above the crowd and cries, “Pick me!” while not being so
avant guarde for a writers’ group that it’s standing in the wrong crowd. It needs to be instantly recognisable and representative of writers without being drenched in
the familiarity, or visual cliché, that breeds contempt.
And so I
turn to you, dear reader. Here are a number of mock ups suggested by our
graphic designer. Voting for your favourite and disparaging your least preferred
are fine but explanatory comments will be even more helpful. “It
took me three minutes to figure out what this one was,” hints at excessive
originality (or possibly that a trip to the optometrist is in order?). “Isn't
that the same quill used by NZ Christian Writers?” sends us to the other end of
the spectrum. Please let us know of any other ideas you may have.
If it's not too greedy, I'd also welcome any comments on where you have struggled to capture the elusive combination of originality and familiarity, theme and variation, same... but different.
I’ll finish
with Omega Writers’ mission statement and a few of its activities so that you
can evaluate which (if any) proposed logo concepts best reflect who we are and
what we do.
Omega Writers exists to educate,
support and inspire Australasian Christian writers towards excellence,
impacting society with grace and truth. We want our words to change the world.
Omega Writers:
·
Runs
and promotes both our own and other Christian writing groups throughout
Australia and New Zealand
·
Aims
to facilitate regular writing workshops, webinars and retreats
·
From
2016 will sponsors the Australian Christian Writers Conference
·
Administers
a growing Directory of Christian Writers and Writing Services
·
Offers
discounts on manuscript assessments
·
Plans
to relaunch the Caleb Prize in 2016
PS Thanks
to the team who made this year’s Christian Writers Conference the
success that it was. Look forward to working with you to make 2016's conference in Sydney even better!
Simon Kennedy is President of Omega Writers. He has won national competitions in both short story and poetry and recently signed his first contract with an international production company to develop one of his original concepts into a television show. His YouTube channel, Songs with Simon, has over 2 million hits.
Hi Simon, I like 1 (because of the colour) and 7. Both use the tagline which adds to the image. If I had to choose I'd pick 7. How would it look if the tagline was in that blue of 1?
ReplyDeleteThanks for seeking out our opinions.
Thanks Ian. Continuing with 7, do you think that a computer as opposed to typewriter might work? I wonder if it would modernise the image but at the risk of generalising, since so many jobs use computers.
Deletewhile not a writer I like the typewriter as it does make you think writer more so than a computer. (I think Jessica Fletcher). But then younger people may think differently.
DeleteThanks Jenny. If we're thinking young people maybe we should put a smart phone or tablet? :)
DeleteI agree that I like the colour in 1, and the use of the tagline in 1 and 7.
ReplyDeleteI see the symbolism in 3, but I think it's redundant: it repeats the text. And some people might wonder what it was.
Thanks Iola. What about a pen that's drawing an Omega symbol in blue?
DeleteThat might work. I think the pencil is a little chunky, but I like the colour and the tagline. If there is an image, it needs to be contemporary - some of the others are a little old-fashioned, IMO.
DeleteAs I scanned through, I felt that No. 1 was the only one that didn't seem 'old-fashioned' - perhaps they would call it 'oldschool' today. If, as Christian writers, we truly want our words to impact and change the world, having a logo that looks back to the way it was, seems counter-intuitive. However, the pencil made me think of visual art, more than writing. Not altogether unrelated - where would we be without picture books. What about the first logo, with a modern writing implement (either pencil or pen) crossed with a feather quill writing implement? It would represent a coming together of writing's heritage with a forward-thinking outlook?
ReplyDeleteThanks for your insightful feedback, Cathie.
DeleteTop one. It grabbed my attention immediately and is the least dated. It feels fresh and integrated. Flowing.
ReplyDeleteThanks Deb. I'm starting to pick up a trend.
Delete1 immediately, as Ian said, because of the colour and tag line, and it's chunky. AND we do still scribble notes on pieces of paper to remind us what we were thinking.
ReplyDelete7 maybe, but it lacks colour, and nobody really uses an old typewriter anymore - it's a cliche that writer's use typewriters. Though they are interesting machines. No quills, please.
To sum up - tag line definitely, colour please, and the chunkier, the better, from my way of thinking
Thanks Meredith. A splash of colour seems to be the way to go. Blue is what we're currently using on the website so that works for me.
DeleteAlso, the circle in No. 1 reminds me of a lens - perfect for representing the idea of the Christian Worldview which underpins our lives and our writing. I like the blue colour as well.
ReplyDeleteNice interpretation. Like that.
DeleteAgreed!
DeleteI like the pen in 5. But like the tagline in 1 and 7. Could the 'O' in 5 be an 'omega' symbol?
ReplyDeleteHi Christine. Did you mean the pen in 4? Or the quill in 5?
DeleteHi Christine. Did you mean the pen in 4? Or the quill in 5?
DeleteColour draws me in every time. No. 1.
ReplyDeleteNo.1 is the only one I like.
ReplyDeleteThanks Adele and Susan. Number one seems to be emerging as the favourite!
DeleteHi Simon, I prefer #1 because it has colour. The coloured pencil pops and the logo has a more contemporary look than the others. But, how does it look as a smaller sized avatar? I'm guessing the tag line may blur if the logo was smaller.
ReplyDeleteGood point, Narelle. I'll discuss that with the designer. I'm sure he knows how to convert it to vectors so it should be fine when enlarged too.
DeleteThanks for asking Simon. Only 1 got a YES from me. :) The others made me think 'ancient'! I do love the circle (eternity, infinite, God, totality, wholeness, perfection?) and the fact that it is yet unfinished. I wonder if the omega sign could be managed inside it somewhere?
ReplyDeleteThanks Anusha. I think it might be possible but the added advantage of the circle is the "O" for Omega is already there, albeit without the Greek symbol.
DeleteHi Simon, these look great! I too like the first one the best, for the same reasons already stated. My only comment would be, although I like the chunkiness of the pencil, it looks a little child-like to me. Could the pencil become a pen, or a thin pencil, perhaps?
ReplyDeleteHi Cate,
DeleteI agree. This appeals to some (child-like) and is off-putting to others (childish). The chunkiness seems to fit with the font?
Yes, it does, and I hadn't noticed the heart which is sweet.
DeleteHas anyone noticed the heart in number one? It could also be perceived as a butterfly.
ReplyDeleteI didn't, but I see it now. That's rather nice. The heart of writing.
DeleteI'm probably weighing in too late here but I like the first one. It has colour and it has a modern contemporary look.
ReplyDeleteI think the ink wells, fountain pens and typewriters potentially give a very dated look which might make us look out of touch with the modern world.
Hi all - for what they're worth here are my thoughts...
ReplyDeleteThe colour of number 1 has proved eye-catching. You definitely need some colour. (Is there a reason all the other options are monochrome?). For that reason alone it's probably the best option.
That said, number 1 is a little... Officeworks?
Apart from the tag-line (which is good), the only thing in the mix to indicate a Christian emphasis is 'omega' itself (the word and the symbol), and perhaps the circle (both indicative I suppose of God's eternal nature, alpha to omega). The heart in the pencil adds some warm sentiment, but may be a ambiguous. My point is, the symbolism is all very understated - is that deliberate?
I reckon trying to appear hip and up to speed with the latest media is almost as bad as appearing 'outdated'. At least a pencil or a quill conveys some sense of connection with the past, rather than a narrow preoccupation with whatever's current. And pens and pencils etc serve as a much clearer (universal) emblem for substantive writing than, say, an iphone or a tablet. Why not a book?
If anything, I'd like to see a logo that could somehow convey the twin focus of Omega on a. writing, and b. Christian faith. I'm not sure any of the above options quite accomplish this as well as could be done. But if these are the only options, it looks like 1 is the winner!
:)